Skip to main content

TPLF's Attack On Afar Proves That "Tigray Under Siege" Is A Sham

But the fact remains that the Ethiopian government is not the one holding Tigray under siege but instead it is TPLF itself that is holding Tigray hostage from receiving any sorts of assistance both from the federal government and humanitarian organizations.

By Ahmed Yusuf


The Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) has been claiming, for a year now, that Tigray is "under siege" and that its forces are fighting until the siege on Tigray is lifted and many international observers especially Western governments have been swayed by this claim. 

In other words, the West has remained hesitant to condemn TPLF when it committed atrocities in Afar and Amhara because it sees TPLF's "breaking the siege" sham objective as a just cause.

But the fact remains that the Ethiopian government is not the one holding Tigray under siege but instead it is TPLF itself that is holding Tigray hostage from receiving any sorts of assistance both from the federal government and humanitarian organizations.

First, after Mekelle was captured on November 28, 2020, the federal government began installing a new Tigrayan interim administration composed of Tigray opposition political parties. During this seven months of administration, the Ethiopian government invested over 100 billion Birr or 2 billion USD, 12 times more than what Tigray used to receive annually, and over 30 humanitarian organizations delivered much needed assistance in a relatively better conditions than what is now.

In spite of this, however, the TPLF was actively working to prevent any power from administrating Tigray other than itself. It assassinated more 100 Tigrayans who were members of the interim administration, attacked aid workers and Eritrean refugees. Most of all, the TPLF managed to convince the locals to kill members of the Ethiopian National Defense Forces (ENDF) who were stationed in Tigray. In the eyes of Ethiopians, it committed the same betrayal as the one when it attacked the Northern Command on November 03, 2020.

As a consequence, the federal government was forced to withdraw from much of Tigray and the TPLF was given the opportunity to serve Tigrayans in Tigray. Nonetheless, the TPLF instead chose to kill, rape and destroy civilian infrastructures in Afar and Amhara region instead of settling to become a government in Tigray and serve the people. This proves that it was TPLF that is getting in the way of Tigray from receiving support both from the federal government and humanitarian organizations.

This is proven when civil servants in Tigray recently began to demand their salaries that the TPLF prevented them from receiving from the federal government since May last year. Hence, TPLF, which sees itself as the government of Tigray, is busy financing its war rather than attending to the needs of people of Tigray.

Second, TPLF has showed itself to be a destructive force heavily armed both with weapons, soldiers and propaganda. It proved that it was capable to break any siege when in August last year it began invading parts of Afar and Amhara region moving its forces as far as 583 KM away from Tigray. This begs the question where does the siege actually break? or was there any siege on Tigray at all? 

Surprisingly, after traveling over 600 KM from Tigray, the TPLF said it "withdrew" its forces "fearing US condemnation". If one accepts, for arguments sake, TPLF's claim that it willingly withdrew from Amhara and Afar, one will come to notice that it has also abandoned its initial "noble cause" of breaking the siege on Tigray succumbing to the US' wish. Yet again one might ask who holds the leash on TPLF or are Tigrayans just pawns in its game of throne.

Third, TPLF recently penetrated 150 KM into Afar region and consequently captured three Woredas including Abala, the only route to deliver humanitarian aid into Tigray, demonstrates that TPLF has not been truthful in its claim that its under siege especially when one understands that the Afar militia were the only ones defending against the heavily armed TPLF forces. And the fact that the ENDF was not present in Afar to help Afar militia when the TPLF invaded Woredas in Kilbet Rasu, Afar, shows that the federal government has not imposed a siege on Tigray.


Popular posts from this blog

EXCLUSIVE: The Malinowski Bill Is Humanitarian Imperialism At Its Most Malicious

America’s humanitarian imperialism has always been malicious, but ESPDA stands apart from everything other than NATO’s War on Libya as being among its cruelest form. By Andrew Korybko —  American political analyst The “ Ethiopia Stabilization, Peace, and Democracy Act ” (ESPDA), popularly known as the “Malinowski Bill” after one of the congressmen who introduced it, doesn’t support either stabilization, peace, or democracy. Rather, it’s the most malicious form of humanitarian imperialism short of a Libyan-like all-out war. ESPDA has mostly been reported to concern sanctions against individuals who the US determines to have either imported “restricted” military equipment, impeded the flow of humanitarian assistance, and/or have been involved in “genocide”, “war crimes”, and “crimes against humanity”. There are several other provisions though that haven’t received all that much attention but definitely deserve to be more widely discussed. The first to touch upon concerns the U

EXCLUSIVE: Dr. Tedros’ Misconduct Defiles The WHO & Disrespects His Compatriots

This objective observation alone should be enough to relinquish him of his duties. The longer that he remains in his role, the worse that the WHO and its UN parent organization’s reputation will become. By Andrew Korybko —  American political analyst Ethiopia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs filed an official objection to the misconduct practiced by World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. They drew attention to how he’s consistently abused his high office to meddle in his homeland’s internal and foreign affairs. He’s also accused of continuing to remain a member of the terrorist-designated TPLF that’s responsible for bringing untold suffering upon millions of people in northern Ethiopia as a result of the war that it started in early November 2020. Furthermore, the objection details other examples of Dr. Tedros’ misconduct. For instance, he’s accused of inflating the emergency level in Ethiopia in order to warrant a humanitarian interven

EXCLUSIVE: Why Is The US Politicizing Ethiopia’s Reported Drone Capabilities?

America is concerned that it’s lost its prior monopoly on drone technology due to recent Turkish, Chinese, and Emirati advancements in this industry, all three of whom US-led Western Mainstream Media reports have claimed are supplying the ENDF.  By Andrew Korybko —  American political analyst All states have the sovereign right to ensure their national security interests, especially in the domestic dimension, through whichever means they deem necessary so long as their moves are responsible and don’t contribute to regional instability. Ethiopia is no different, which is why it’s concerning that the US has suddenly decided to politicize its reported drone capabilities. Reuters exclusively reported that Horn of Africa envoy Jeffrey Feltman discussed the issue of suspected Turkish drone sales to Ethiopia during his latest trip to that West Asian country. According to the outlet, American officials have “profound humanitarian concerns” about Ethiopian-Turkish military cooperati